About the Bath Sport Group  |  News & Press  |  Bath Rugby Club  |  Bath Cricket Club  |  Team Bath  |  B&NES GET ACTIVE
 
     
  STATEMENT TO REC TRUSTEES
(JUN 2007)
 
     
  REC TRUSTEE LEGAL ISSUES
(JAN 2007)

 
     
  PRESS STATEMENT:
BATHSPORT SUPPORTS ‘KEEP BATH RUGBY AT THE REC’ CAMPAIGN
(07/11/06)

 
     
  The future of the Bath Recreation Ground:
Bath Sport submission to the Strategic Review - October 2006
 
     
 

Bath Chronicle
17 October 2005.
VISION FOR FUTURE OF REC

 
     
  BathSport
Public Meeting at Pavilion, 30 September 2005.
Summary notes
Question and answer session
 
     
  Bath Chronicle 1 October 2005
Rec revolution – consortium warns city risks missing out on benefits of Olympics if it can’t agree
 
     
  Bath Chronicle Comment - 1 October 2005
Extra time in debate on Rec
 
     
  Bath Chronicle – 30 august 2005
Opponents must make a real case
 
     
  Bath Chronicle – 27 August 2005
Consortium backs bid to redevelop ground
Businessman shows his support but warns of political and legal restrictions
 
     
  Bath Chronicle – 22 August 2005
Rugby sustainable in Bath city centre
 
     
  Bath Chronicle – 19 August 2005
Get on with Rec plan as soon as possible
 
     
  Bath Chronicle – 29 July2005
Rec stands come under pressure
 
     
  Bath Chronicle – 28 July 2005
Rugby is a vital party of the city
 
     
  Bath Chronicle – 28 July 2005
Bath facing Rec dilemma
 
     
 

The Bath Chronicle – Editorial Comment – 22 July 2005
A bold vision of wide-open space

 
     
  Bath Chronicle – Sporting dream for the heart of Bath  
     
  Bath Chronicle – 22 July 2005
Time to fulfil the potential
 
     
  Bath Chronicle – 22 July 2005
‘We must get away from the idea that we want just rugby’
 
     
  Bath Chronicle – 22 July 2005
Chainsaws provoked birth of group
 
      Homepage
 

Bath Chronicle – 22 August 2005
Rugby sustainable in Bath city centre – a letter from Daniel Wiley

I think that the proposed solution to draw inspiration from John Wood’s ideas for bath, while developing excellent facilities for all sports in bath, would answer many problems.
Mr. drew would gain another excellent view of our beautiful city, the grass-covered area of the Rec looks as if it would actually increase and Mr. drew could potentially gain space to enjoy his game of hockey even on match days. Plus all the local sporting facilities would be given a much needed boost.
These proposals are nothing to do with me and I agree it would be nice to know who these people are, but I have been assured that this question will be answered shortly and I understand that some confidences do need to be respected, so I am quite prepared to wait.
However, there are other solutions if this one is truly unpalatable that can be discussed. Indeed, I would be more than happy to discuss options with anyone with constructive ideas.
Now to consider Mr. Drew’s other points. Of course his voice is equally valid as mine, but I believe in this case, in the extreme minority. Surely it can’t support his argument that people outside the city centre – as I would call Southdown, incidentally – support my argument?
He seems to suggest something about traffic being a problem but I’m sure that it can be shown that most people either arrive by train, bus, park and ride or on foot. Those who do arrive by car are clearly fewer than those attracted by any summer weekend or the working population of Bath. Is he suggesting there is additional parking facilities provided just for rugby matches or that there are more unused spaces on a July Saturday?
Pushing the rugby away from the city centre would only encourage more people to travel through Bath by car.
Furthermore, it is my view that Premiership rugby will not even get close to matching Premiership football in terms of crowd sizes and is therefore unlikely to expand beyond its current size.
Therefore, the club is quite sustainable in the centre of the city with the population and infrastructure of Bath.


top